Report on the International
Symposium, Milan,
November 2003 - (abstracted)
By Belinda Cupid, PhD
Research Development MND Association
England , Wales and Northern Ireland
Over the weekend of 15-16 November, researchers, clinicians and healthcare
professionals from 32 countries started to congregate in Milan . Bemused
locals wondered if these people knew that they were about a month too
late for the Milan Fashion Week. However, over 700 delegates attending
the 14th International Symposium on ALS/MND knew something that most
of the locals didn't - that the Quark Hotel in Milan was THE place to
be, to learn about the latest trends in ALS/MND care and research.
The big question that everyone wants to know the answer to is why do
people develop ALS/MND. In the opening presentation of the Symposium
Dr. Ettori Beghi (Milan, Italy) described how population registries are
a useful way of collecting information on and analysis of possible risk
factors for ALS/MND.
Dr. Beghi presented a challenge to neurologists planning clinical trials
when he suggested that a more detailed understanding of the trial participants
might give a truer picture of the effects of the drug under investigation.
Qualitative research allows
us "to explore the context of people's
responses and the explanations for them," explained Dr. Jane Ritchie
from National Centre for Social Research, UK at the beginning of her
presentation. "We can look closely at people's individual circumstances
and the underlying factors influencing their feelings and perspectives".
This type of research is crucial to developing evidence on which to build
the standards of care for people with ALS/MND. In conclusion, Dr. Ritchie
encouraged delegates to consider the use of qualitative research in their
work, to further knowledge in the field of ALS/MND and how it affects
people's lives.
Everybody needs good neighbors:
Soon after the discovery that mutations (abnormalities) in the SOD1
gene caused a fifth of all cases of the rare, familial form of ALS/MND
10 years ago, researchers developed an animal model of ALS/MND, by incorporating
the mutated human SOD1 gene into mice. These mice develop an adult onset
motor neuron disease. In both mice and humans one of the conundrums of
understanding this form of ALS/MND is why these mutations are only toxic
to motor neurons, when they are present in every cell in the body.
The latest research by Dr. Don Cleveland from California , USA presented
at the Symposium went some way to answering these questions. Dr. Cleveland
has bred mice that contain a random mixture of cells containing normal
and mutated SOD1 respectively. He found that there was a large variation
on the survival time in these mice. Animals with an equal mix of cells
containing healthy and mutated forms of the SOD1 gene did not go on to
develop ALS/MND. In other words the cells containing the normal SOD1
gene appear to rescue or protect the neighbouring motor neurons with
the mutated gene.
To his surprise Dr. Cleveland
found that as little as 35% of the cells containing normal SOD1 gene
can have a protective effect. However, these observed effects also
have a down side. The presence of a few cells containing the damaged
SOD1 gene can cause their healthy neighbouring motor neurons to degenerate.
Thus he commented, "having good neighbours matters"!
" This research has great therapeutic implications" Dr. Cleveland
concluded, "The delivery of normal non-neuronal cells to spinal
cords could be completely protective, without replacing a single neuron".
Clinical trials:
There was barely a seat left
in the room for the clinical trials session, which was the scene of
mixed emotions and controversy. The disappointing results of a creatine
clinical trial presented in Melbourne 2002 were reinforced with the
results of a further trial presented in Milan . "At
5g (per day) we could not determine a benefit of creatine in people with
ALS/MND," concluded Dr. Jeremy Shefner from New York , USA representing
the trial consortium.
Hope :
The rate that a drug is broken down by the body can affect its beneficial
effects. A small percentage of people taking Riluzole break down the
drug faster than average. Dr. Geert Groeneveld ( Utrecht , Netherlands
) presented a study investigating the effects of increasing the dose
of Riluzole in this minority, to maintain the optimal concentration of
the drug in the body. Although no serious adverse effects were observed,
Dr. Groeneveld suggested that further study was needed before a higher
dose of Riluzole could be routinely given.
Principal investigator Dr. Paul Gordon described two studies that showed
that the antibiotic minocycline was safe and well tolerated for up to
eight months in people with ALS/MND. Following the success of these trials,
plans for a Phase III study to investigate the beneficial effects of
minocycline are underway.
Delegates also heard from Dr. Ben Brooks, Madison USA who described
how the possible beneficial effects of the breast cancer chemotherapy
agent Tamoxifen came to light. Patients with a co-diagnosis of ALS/MND
and breast cancer seemed to survive longer than those with the diagnosis
of ALS/MND alone. Laboratory investigations suggested that Tamoxifen
might be beneficial for people with ALS/MND.
In preliminary results of an ongoing 12-month study, Dr. Brooks showed
that Tamoxifen did not have any serious side effects in the 100 trial
participants. Further results of this and future studies will confirm
the very early indications of improvements in muscle strength and survival
of people with ALS/MND.
Controversy and surprise: Following
the recent publication of her paper on a study to investigate the feasibility
and safety of administering stem cells to people with ALS/MND, Dr.
Mazzini gave an update on her research in this session of the Symposium.
From the seven patients that have received stem cells to date Mazzini
and colleagues concluded that "Our results appear to demonstrate that transplantation
of these (stem) cells into the spinal cord of humans are safe and well
tolerated by ALS patients".
As in clinical studies of potential drugs, Dr. Mazzini used several
standard tests for muscle strength and respiratory function to monitor
progress during the study. Data from these measures up to 21 months after
and 6 months prior to receiving additional stem cells were presented.
All the patients are still alive, although both muscle strength and respiratory
function are declining. One interpretation of the data is that the patients
are declining at a slower rate after receiving the additional stem cells.
In such a small group of patients, with no controls, it is difficult
to say whether any differences in the rate of decline of muscle strength
or in respiratory function would be due to the stem cell treatment or
to the natural progression of the disease in these individuals. In addition
to the clinical study, Dr. Mazzini briefly mentioned a study in progress
in animal models of ALS/MND.
Dr. Mazzini's presentation
evoked some robust debate on both the methodology and ethics of conducting
such controversial studies. These echoed Professor Michael Swash's
caution in an editorial of the journal in which this study was published "it is inappropriate, in the present state of
knowledge, to use stem cells as a therapy in ALS".
In the closing session of the Symposium Dr. Lucie Bruijn, Science Director
and Vice President of ALS Association, named three drugs that may be
beneficial in ALS/MND. Promethazine, Ebselen and Cetriaxone were identified
as a result of a large screening program in which 75% of the drugs licensed
by the FDA were investigated. These drugs were found to have some beneficial
effects in two or more laboratory assays and were studied further in
SOD1 mice. These animal experiments are in progress and Dr. Bruijn commented
that a report is being written for publication next year. Further information
is available from the ALS Association website.
Although two of these drugs are licensed for other indications in the
UK , it should be stressed that these are very preliminary studies on
their possible, beneficial effects for ALS/MND.
Italian appreciation After expressing our appreciation
for the evening's entertainer (an accompanied tenor) at the Symposium
dinner, it was time to acknowledge the contribution of professionals
that make a difference to people with ALS/MND. Dr. David Oliver, Palliative
Care Consultant based at the Wisdom Hospice in Kent , UK was awarded
the International Alliance of ALS/MND Association's Humanitarian Award.
The award was given in recognition of his international educational role
in the provision of palliative care in ALS/MND. The Award is supported
by CINI, a member of the Alliance .
Every year the contribution of an eminent neurologist who also runs
an active research program is recognized by awarding the International
Alliance Forbes Norris Award. This year the award was made to Dr. Bob
Brown of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston , USA . He is particularly
known for encouraging international collaborations - many careers of
well-respected North American and European researchers have been enhanced
from a period as a visiting scientist in his laboratory.
In light of this award it
was fitting that Dr. Bob Brown had been invited to give the closing
presentation of the Symposium. He started his upbeat talk by asserting, "We have 10 more therapeutic targets than we
had 10 years ago". These include targeting other cells in addition
to motor neurons. Dr. Brown also suggested that these drugs will probably
involve "different agents acting in concert". One of the hurdles
for developing drugs to treat ALS/MND is their adequate delivery into
the brain and spinal cord. In the remainder of his talk Dr. Brown highlighted
a number of new developments that could solve this problem. These included
the potential of both gene and stem cell therapies respectively. "There
is a sea change coming in ALS research," he concluded.
|